Afghanistan Could Unravel Faster than Iraq

Having spent several weeks auditing ballots in Afghanistan’s fraud-plagued presidential vote, election officials there are expected to declare a winner within days. If the two candidates vying for the post fail to reach a power-sharing deal beforehand, the announcement could easily kick off a wave of unrest that would all but guarantee a catastrophic wind-down to America’s longest war.

The window of opportunity to strike a compromise is narrowing dangerously. Without a new government in place, the Obama administration may well pull back on plans to keep a military contingent in Afghanistan beyond 2014, and without that force, the international community will cease bankrolling the impoverished nation.

Abdullah Abdullah, the former foreign minister, not without reason, is fighting the outcome of an election in which his rival, former finance minister Ashraf Ghani, is widely expected to be declared the winner. Western officials say that the audit of millions of ballots cast on June 14 has made clear that the scope and sophistication of fraud was staggering even for Afghan standards. Having ceded another fraud-plagued election to President Hamid Karzai in 2009, Mr. Abdullah and his powerful backers are not willing to concede defeat in another corrupt election.

But they ought to understand that they stand to lose far more by being intransigent. The Taliban are fighting hard to retake crucial urban areas, and the country’s anemic economy is likely to collapse amid the uncertainty.

The Obama administration, which had preferred to limit its involvement in the election, has sensibly offered a power-sharing structure under which the losing candidate, or a designee, would hold a chief executive position with considerable authority.

A senior American official said that Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah appear close to signing off formally on the deal, but they remain at odds over just how much power the losing candidate would wield. One sticking point is whether ministers would report to the chief executive, rather than to the president.

Continue reading the main story 25Comments Continue reading the main story

Recent Comments

iona

1 hour ago

Everybody OUT. Let them deal with their own problems we only make things worse because we are there to support either thug and get those…

Prof.Jai Prakash Sharma,

1 hour ago

The entire history of Afghanistan being full of external power rivalry, bloody tribal feuds and wars, how could it deviate from its…

FXQ

4 hours ago

Flip a coin, whoever wins is the president, and the other is vice president for the first term. Then, the roles are switched for the second…

  • See All Comments
  • Write a comment

Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah have displayed considerable pragmatism in recent weeks as the electoral dispute has dragged on, raising hopes that they could in fact govern jointly. This week, the two men sent a letter to NATO leaders meeting in Wales, pledging that they are committed to forming a “government of national unity that will honor the epic participation of our people in the electoral process.” The message shows that both men understand continued international support to be indispensable for the fledgling state they aspire to lead.

A solution to the government crisis will take more than pragmatism, though. Both candidates must rein in their most reactionary constituents and work hard to manage expectations in the days ahead. The power-sharing deal will need to be detailed, clear and public to reduce the temptation for the winner to sideline his rival after taking office.

In this crisis, the Obama administration has had to take on a broker’s role. It must remain engaged and patient in helping the Afghans avert the chaos of a government rived by ethnic or sectarian divisions. The alternative could look much like Iraq’s unraveling. Except in Afghanistan, it would almost certainly come quicker

Pakistan, Its Own Worst Enemy

Pakistan faces very big problems: a failing economy; a Taliban insurgency; and persistent tension with India, which has resulted again in exchanges of cross-border fire. The country’s leaders and citizens obviously need to join in common cause to put the country on a steadier course.

Alas, this is Pakistan. For the past two weeks, thousands of protesters in Islamabad have been demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. His critics have every right to express their views peacefully. But forcing his resignation is the last thing Pakistan needs.

It would further polarize society, weaken the fragile democratic institutions and strengthen a powerful military, which says it wants to be out of politics but has regularly staged coups and otherwise sought to control civilian governments for three decades.

Mr. Sharif came to office in a parliamentary election 15 months ago, the first peaceful, democratic transition of power between civilian leaders in the country’s history. It was a hopeful moment; some 60 percent of voters turned out, and most people seemed willing to accept his victory.

The current anti-Sharif anger is being stoked by two men. Imran Khan, a prominent cricketer turned politician, wants new elections. Muhammad Tahir-ul Qadri, a cleric of the Sufi Islam sect, is pushing for the creation of a unity government. The protesters have demanded electoral reforms and Mr. Sharif’s removal because of alleged corruption in the 2013 election. Some believe that the army, which has an uneasy history with Mr. Sharif, has had a hand in the crisis. Reports that Mr. Khan and Mr. Qadri are negotiating with the army chief of staff are unsettling.

Mr. Sharif’s brief tenure has been marked by sectarian tensions, power outages, insurgent-related violence and a failure to deliver on campaign promises of economic revival. He has also named cronies to high posts. But forcing him out now and in this way is not the answer. A smarter approach is to make democratic processes work through reforms to prevent electoral fraud and rampant cronyism. It will also require negotiation and compromise.

The United States, preoccupied with crises elsewhere, has shown little urgency in trying to calm the situation, even though Pakistan’s stability is crucial to regional order — especially as American troops withdraw from Afghanistan. It should be pressing Pakistan’s army, in particular, to reject any idea of staging a coup. Mr. Sharif should resolve to govern better while the military focuses on its primary concern, defeating the Taliban threat.

MQM UK member hauled up in London re Imran Farooq murder

London, Aug 27: Scotland Yard  late on Wednesday released a suspect arrested in connection with the murder of former Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader Dr Imran Farooq, Express News reported.

The suspect has been asked to appear before the police again in mid-November this year.

Earlier, a spokesperson for the Scotland Yard confirmed to The Express Tribune that the suspect was arrested from East London this morning. He is currently being kept in custody where he is being interrogated. The suspect is reportedly a British Pakistani, but Scotland Yard did not confirm the nationality of the suspect.

He is said to be an MQM UK unit member, party officials told The Express Tribune.

The suspect is the second man to be arrested in the case so far. Last June, the Scotland Yard arrested a nephew of MQM chief Altaf Hussain, 52-year-old man Iftikhar Hussain. He was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to murder and is currently on bail.

Further, in May, Scotland Yard released pictures of two suspects allegedly involved in the murder of Farooq.

Scotland Yard claimed that the two suspects, identified as Mohsin Ali Syed and Mohammed Kashif Khan Kamran, were believed to be in Pakistan and had traveled to London on student visas. They are also believed to be residents of Karachi.

Farooq, 50, was a former leader of MQM and had lived in London in self-imposed exile from 1999. He was on his way back from work when he was attacked outside his home in Edgware, north London, in September 2010. A post-mortem gave the cause of death as multiple stab wounds and blunt trauma to the head. A kitchen knife and a house brick used in the attack were recovered at the scene.

Govt Seeks to Evacuate Pakistanis from Libya

Expats leave Libya (Credit: todayzaman.com)
Expats leave Libya
(Credit: todayzaman.com)
ISLAMABAD, Aug 4: With the situation in Libya deteriorating in recent days, the Pakistani mission there has been working to evacuate up to 6,000 citizens to neighbouring Tunisia for repatriation to Pakistan.

A statement from the Foreign Office on Monday evening said that the Pakistani embassy in Libya was in touch with the Pakistani community there and were making arrangements to evacuate between 3,000-6,000 citizens.

Clashes in troubled Libya have intensified over the week with a depot near the airport in Tripoli set ablaze over the weekend during clashes between rival groups. Citizens of a number of countries have been advised to leave as the situation turns tense, but evacuation has proved tricky with airports closed.

Since no airport in Libya is currently functioning, the government is working on arranging on-arrival visas for Pakistanis at the Tunisian border. Once in Tunisia, these Pakistanis can then be repatriated to Pakistan.

“Our Embassy in Tripoli has already registered a large number of Pakistanis and referred their documents to Tunisian authorities for visa on arrival,” the statement read.

The foreign office advised all Pakistanis in Libya to contact the embassy in Tripoli and Tunisia and inform the officials about their location and get registered.

Pakistan Embassy can be contacted on the following help lines:
–         No. 00218 922379368 (Ayaz Khan)
–         No. 00218 922555216 (Kamran)
–         No. 00218 213610937
–         No. 00218 213616581 (0900 to 1600 hours)

Rejection of Pak Asylum Seekers Keeping them Away from US

San Francisco, Aug 2: Although the number of Pakistanis seeking refuge in other countries is rising, those seeking asylum from the proverbial land of opportunity – the United States – are declining in number.

In the years before and shortly after the 9/11 attacks, the US was a country of choice for thousands of Pakistanis looking to emigrate. In 2002, close to 20% of the 7,000 Pakistanis wanting to leave their country applied to the US for asylum. In 2013, of over 26,000 Pakistanis seeking asylum, less than 2.5% were asking to enter the once-friendly United States.

“Muslims have been targeted by the Department of Homeland Security, and the United States is simply not hospitable to Muslim asylum-seekers,” observed Matthew L Kolken, a New York-based attorney and a senior member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Among 44 industrialised countries with asylum-seekers, Pakistan currently ranks sixth, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Last year, Pakistan witnessed an 11 per cent rise in asylum-seekers, according to the agency.

The reasons for leaving Pakistan have become more urgent as the country continues to grapple with its fledgling democracy.

Generally, the applicants are claiming fear of persecution, from either terrorists or extremist groups, said Harnam S Arneja, a Washington DC-based lawyer who has taken on asylum cases.

But access to asylum in the US has become extremely difficult and cumbersome because of changes to the application standards and a decreased rate of approvals, explained Arneja. “Any applicant, including a Pakistani, has to prove credible fear of persecution, either in the past or in future if he or she returns to Pakistan.”

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USICS) and Department of Homeland Security data revealed that 4,113 applications of asylum-seekers were received from 2002 to April 2014. Around 1,736 applications were approved, 115 denied and 1,742 adjudicated referred. The ‘adjudicated referred’ column refers to cases that USICS is not able to approve. “Such cases are referred to federal immigration courts, where a judge makes the final determination on eligibility,” said Tim Counts, the USCIS spokesperson.

These statistics do not include all nationals from Pakistan who applied for asylum during these years, he explained.

Separately, US Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) Public Affairs Officer Christine Getzler Vaughan told The Express Tribune that since 2002, America has resettled 927 refugees from Pakistan. She, however, explained that these statistics do not include those who may have immigrated to the US via other means or sought asylum after arrival.

 

Pakistani jurist Majid Bashir, who deals with asylum-seekers’ cases, has listed several reasons for the declining trend in asylum-seeking in the United States.

The US imposed restrictions on Pakistan by putting her on the watch list when it comes to dealing with trade and intellectual property rights, he said, pointing to some. “New laws and Muslims’ alleged involvement in security-related issues and incidents could be the major reason behind it,” he added.

And it seems like the trend of declining asylum-seekers is here to stay – Pakistanis have made the choice of not seeking opportunities in the ‘land of opportunity’.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 2nd, 2014.

US Mentors Prepare to Let Afghan Forces Go it Alone

US mentors in Afghanistan (Credit: nytimes.com)
US mentors in Afghanistan
(Credit: nytimes.com)

KOH-E-SAFI, Afghanistan, July 21 — The small and cherubic governor of Koh-e-Safi District was struggling to compute the meaning of the American troop withdrawal.

He had just finished crediting a young American Special Forces captain for improved security in his district, an area near Kabul that has been a busy staging ground for insurgent attacks. Now, suddenly, he was trying to talk about his plans for when the team of Green Berets leaves in August.

“Well, we hope it will not happen,” he said, flattening his hands on his desk. “We think the Americans will find a way to stay.”

The captain, having been through this routine before, interjected: “We are out of here by the end of the summer. It’s happening. And if there’s no plan to fill that void, then that’s what people in this room need to be talking about right now.”

The American Special Forces teams have over the past decade become a central part of the local security landscape in Afghanistan. The 12-man teams are embedded in remote areas with a high insurgent threat, and they train indigenous police and elite Afghan units while coordinating the efforts of the local government and security bureaucracies. They also hunt down Taliban figures.

For many Afghans, they have been the face of the American military presence, for better or worse. But they are leaving. Even if a long-term security agreement is signed with the United States, these teams in their current form will not be part of the tiny force that will remain.

Whether the Afghan forces can sustain themselves in the critical districts the Green Berets will be ceding to them is an urgent question all over the country. The answer will help define America’s legacy in Afghanistan, much as it has in Iraq, where the Iraqi forces have fallen apart in combat.

The void in some places will be hard to fill. Beyond being a deterrent to the Taliban, the teams grant a measure of confidence to the Afghan forces they fight alongside. That confidence is already being tested: In the past few months, the Taliban have been aggressively going after the security forces in places the Americans have left.

In places like Koh-e-Safi, a district of ashen mountains of silt, rock and chromite, there is worry about what will come after the Americans.

“I’m not sure they have the confidence to do this once we leave,” said the Green Beret team captain, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of military rules. “Over the last few years, they have come to rely on Americans’ solving their problems.”

The sentiment is shared, to some degree, among the other team members, most of whom have deployed several times in Afghanistan.

“This country is going to turn into a warlord environment,” said one sergeant on his fifth tour. “Until these guys are willing to fight for a sense of nationalism, I don’t see how this changes.”

But sustainability is more than fighting. It is a matter of logistics: feeding and fueling forces spread across the country, perhaps the greatest challenge for the Afghan forces.

“We have modeled them so much on us that they have taken on more logistical requirements than they need,” the team sergeant said.

As a result, it is likely that the Afghan Army Special Forces team, which is meant to do the same thing for the district that its American counterparts do, will go elsewhere when the Americans depart. There simply will not be the logistical support for it in Koh-e-Safi.

During the meeting in his office, the governor, Saifullah Bedar, raised another issue that has increasingly been on Afghans’ minds: Iraq’s rapid disintegration after the American withdrawal there.

“What is the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan?” Mr. Bedar asked the captain.

“I was in Iraq near the end,” the team leader fired back. “When we left, they were set up for success. The decisions they made in the following three years left them where they are now.”

An American Special Forces captain observes how his Afghan trainees do on their own as they meet villagers near Taliban territory in Parwan Province. Credit Diego Ibarra Sanchez for The New York Times

The room was silent, everyone fidgeting in the suffocating heat.

“The same thing can happen in Koh-e-Safi if the government and security forces don’t make the right decisions,” the captain warned.

By most accounts, the American team in Koh-e-Safi has done well. It has brokered relationships with local leaders, trained nearly 130 police officers, and mentored two Afghan Special Forces teams. It has also helped keep the Taliban mostly confined to the remote southern half of the district, but there are worries here that the militants will find a way to creep back after the Americans leave.

The commander of one of the local police checkpoints here, Shaman Gul, visited the Americans last month on a hill overlooking his village, Damdar. From the hilltop, plots of emerald farmland could be seen in the valley basins below, rare flashes of color in an otherwise gray-brown tableau.

I wish all involved well but, naturally, there are doubts. The performance of the South Vietnamese Army in 1975 and that of the Iraqi Army…The only thing that the Afghans will miss is the free and easy money that is being funneled into their country.

Mr. Shaman Gul, who also owns a tailoring shop in Damdar, said he recently got a call from the Taliban, who reminded him that the Americans would be leaving soon. While he insists he is unafraid, he knows that things will change soon.

On the walk around his base, a ramshackle affair fortified with barriers and wire, he began noting deficiencies the Americans might help resolve.

“We only have 120 bullets a man,” he told the captain, shrugging.

“When is the last time you guys were in a firefight?” the captain asked, knowing it had been months. Mr. Shaman Gul shrugged again.

More than ever, the Special Forces are trying to have their Afghan counterparts take the lead. While that has always ostensibly been the plan, it only really began to be a focus this year, when it dawned on commanders that one way or another they were leaving. The American team captain in Koh-e-Safi acknowledged that it had been hard to keep his men from going out on missions.

On a recent operation near Chanerai, a small village of mud homes arranged in a valley near the edge of Taliban territory, the Green Berets tested their resolve to allow their Afghan comrades to operate alone. From the top of a barren ridgeline, the captain peered through binoculars, watching as the Afghan team organized a meeting, or shura, with the locals.

“I want to know what’s going on in there,” the captain said, pulling the binoculars away, impatience creeping into his voice. “I want to see firsthand how the Afghan soldiers are handling the shura.”

In a departure from past missions, the Americans would not go into the village. They would not press the Afghans to ask direct questions. They would not challenge dismissive answers from villagers. They would, instead, stand on the peripheral ridgeline, peering down at the village and scanning the valley for ambushes.

“When the Americans go in, the villagers act differently,” the captain said. “We become the focus of attention.”

A few of the men drove all-terrain vehicles along the ridgeline. But one soldier, angling around a truck on the side of a ravine, lost control. As the vehicle turned down the hill, the sergeant quickly hopped off.

Everyone stood silently, watching weaponry, tarps and other equipment catapulted off the four-wheeler as it cartwheeled down the hill. Its broken body somehow landed upright.

Airlines Scale Back Flights to Pakistan

Emirates Comment
Emirates Comment

KARACHI, June 25: Emirates said on Wednesday that it was suspending flights to and from Peshawar, just hours after bullets pierced through a Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) plane near the airport, killing one female passenger.

The Dubai-based airline said flights have been suspended from June 25 until further notice due to the security situation at the Peshawar airport.

“Passengers booked to travel between June 25 and 27 can cancel their booking, rebook to travel at a later date, or fly to another Emirates destination in Pakistan,” the airline said in a brief statement on its website.

Emirates operate five weekly flights to Peshawar. Moreover, it has a schedule of 66 weekly flights to Pakistan. It could not be immediately confirmed when flights will resume.

Untitled-1

Etihad Airways also suspended one of its Abu Dhabi to Peshawar flight on Wednesday citing security concerns. “The airline’s next flight to Peshawar, scheduled to depart from Abu Dhabi on Thursday night, June 26, is still under review.”

Senior CAA, security and administration officials were busy in a meeting late into the evening to discuss what measures could be taken to beef up monitoring around the airport.

A similar suspension followed a militant attack on the Peshawar airport in 2012 when besides Emirates, all Middle East carriers, including Qatar and Etihad Airways, had stopped their flights.

Pakistan’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has allowed Emirates to operate additional flights to Islamabad to facilitate its passengers, a senior official of the aviation regulator told The Express Tribune.

“The last time these airlines stopped coming to Peshawar, the operations remained suspended for one month. We are not sure how long this latest episode will continue,” he said.

The CAA has come under immense pressure since the ferocious attempt by armed militants to take over Karachi airport ended in the death of over two dozen people and pushed a leading airline to roll back operations to Pakistan.

Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific has already announced that its flight taking off from Karachi on June 29 would be the last, more than 13 years after it started flying to Pakistan.

Leading airlines, including British Airways, Singapore Airlines, Lufthansa and Malaysian Airlines, have scaled back their operations since 2012 in part due to concerns related to the security of their employees.

British Airways suspended operation following a deadly attack on Islamabad’s Marriott Hotel in 2008.

Currently, only 19 foreign carriers come to Pakistan.

The gun attack on PIA aircraft so near the runway is of particular concern especially when congested residential colonies have sprouted up around Peshawar, Karachi and Lahore airports.

“This was not the first time bullets were fired upon on a landing plane at the Peshawar airport,” said CAA officials. “Pilots have reported similar incidents before.”

Regarding the latest attack, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Managing Director Junaid Yunus praised senior pilot Captain Tariq Chaudhry who was commanding the Riyadh-Peshawar flight for ensuring a safe landing.

“It is very important for us to realise the fact that our pilot didn’t lose his nerves,” he said. “Things could have gone horribly wrong if the firing incident had confused him.”

Published in The Express Tribune, June 26th, 2014.

Drones hit Taliban hideouts in ‘joint Pakistan-U.S.’ raid, say officials

Drones in N. Waziristan (Credit: epakistan.com)
Drones in N. Waziristan
(Credit: epakistan.com)

ISLAMABAD/MIRANSHAH  June 12 – U.S. drones fired missiles at Taliban hideouts in Pakistan killing at least 10 militants in response to a deadly attack on Karachi airport, officials said on Thursday, in the first such raids by unmanned CIA aircraft in six months.

Two top government officials said Islamabad had given the Americans “express approval” for the strikes – the first time Pakistan has admitted to such cooperation.

Underlining Pakistan’s alarm over the brazen Taliban attack on the airport, just weeks after peace talks with the Islamist militants stalled, the officials told Reuters a “joint Pakistan-U.S. operation” had been ordered to hit the insurgents.

Another official said Pakistan had asked the United States for help after the attack on the country’s busiest airport on Sunday, and would be intensifying air strikes on militant hideouts in coming days.

Pakistan publicly opposes U.S. drone strikes, saying they kill too many civilians and violate its sovereignty, although in private officials have admitted the government supports them.

“The attacks were launched with the express approval of the Pakistan government and army,” said a top government official, requesting not to be named as he was not authorised to discuss the issue with the media.

“It is now policy that the Americans will not use drones without permission from the security establishment here. There will be complete coordination and Pakistan will be in the loop.

We understand that drones will be an important part of our fight against the Taliban now,” the official added.

The strikes were the first in the nuclear-armed South Asian nation since an attack in December last year in which three suspected militants were killed. The CIA conducts covert drone operations against terrorism suspects.

Speculation has been rising that Pakistan is preparing for a full-scale military operation in North Waziristan, a scenario Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has resisted for months in favour of a negotiated end to the insurgency.

But talks with the Taliban have collapsed many times since Sharif announced his plan in February and set up a committee of negotiators, mainly over Taliban demands that the government withdraw all troops from tribal areas and impose Sharia law.

AFGHANISTAN CONNECTION

Pakistan military sources said six militants including four Uzbeks were killed in the first strike on Wednesday around five km (three miles) north of Miranshah, the capital of the North Waziristan tribal region where Taliban insurgents are holed up.

The second attack killed four militants in the same area around 2 a.m. on Thursday.

Another source, a senior member of the Afghan Taliban, put the death toll at 16, with 10 killed in the second strike.

A senior member of the Afghan Taliban said all the 10 militants killed in the second strike were affiliated with the feared Haqqani network that regularly launches attacks on Western forces in Afghanistan and which until last month held U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl.

“The drones targeted two mini vans which were carrying Taliban fighters associated with the Haqqani network to Afghanistan for an attack,” the Taliban commander said.

The twin drone strikes came after at least 38 people, including 10 insurgents, were killed when militants raided Karachi airport on Sunday night. The Pakistani Taliban are allied with the Afghan militants of the same name and share a similar jihadist ideology.

But they operate as a separate entity, focused entirely on toppling the Pakistani state and establishing strict Islamic rule, whereas the Afghan Taliban are united by their campaign against invading foreign forces.

Sunday’s assault destroyed prospects for peace talks between the Taliban and Sharif’s government, after months of failed attempts to engage the al Qaeda-linked militants in dialogue on how to end years of violence.

The Pakistan government officially condemned the latest strikes and said such attacks “have a negative impact on the government’s efforts to bring peace and stability in Pakistan and the region”. But top officials privately admit the Pakistani government is weighing all options after the Karachi attack.

(Additional reporting by Asim Tanveer in Multan and Jibran Ahmed in Peshawar; Editing by Maria Golovnina and Jeremy Laurence)

Pakistan Condemns Drone Attacks in N. Waziristan

FO spokeswoman (Credit: pakistantribe.com)
FO spokeswoman
(Credit: pakistantribe.com)

ISLAMABAD, June 19: The government of Pakistan condemned the two incidents of US drone strikes that took place near Miramshah, North Waziristan during the early hours of Wednesday.

According to a statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday, where they termed the strikes as a “violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

“These strikes have a negative impact on the government’s efforts to bring peace and stability in Pakistan and the region.”

Wednesday’s strikes killed at least six people. On June 11, two successive drone strikes reportedly killed around 16 people and injured few others.

There have been three drone strikes this year, killing around 20 people.

TTP’s Uzbek Allies Killed after Claiming Karachi Airport attack

Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (Credit: bbc.co.uk)
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
(Credit: bbc.co.uk)

The first U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan in almost six months targeted militants from Afghanistan’s Haqqani network, killing one of the insurgent group’s senior commanders, Pakistani intelligence officials said on Thursday.

Drones struck two locations in Pakistan’s North Waziristan tribal region, near the border with Afghanistan, killing at least 11 suspected militants on Wednesday, these officials added. The second strike, at around 2:30 a.m. local time on Thursday, hit a Haqqani network compound near Miranshah, North Waziristan’s capital, killing at least eight.

Among those eight was Haji Gul, described by Pakistani intelligence officials and local militants as a senior Haqqani field commander whose advice was regularly sought by the group’s leadership.

The Haqqani network is part of the Afghan Taliban but operates autonomously, mostly in eastern Afghanistan. Its main base is in North Waziristan.

A vehicle, rigged for use in a suicide attack, was also destroyed in the attack, Pakistani officials said. They said the militants were preparing for a mission across the border in Afghanistan.

The Haqqani network has carried out a series of high-profile attacks in Afghanistan against Western targets, including the Sept. 13, 2011, assault on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

The U.S. Department of State formally designated it a terrorist organization in 2012.

Several U.S. officials have accused Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency of backing the Haqqanis, a charge the ISI denied. In 2011, then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen described the group as a “veritable arm” of the ISI.

The U.S. has long been asking Pakistan to go after militant groups in North Waziristan. Pakistan so far hasn’t launched a full-scale military offensive in the region, where several militant groups, including al Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban, operate. However, it has regularly carried out airstrikes and limited ground operations against the Pakistani Taliban in North Waziristan.

In the first drone strike, which broke the near-six-month lull around 8:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Uzbek and ethnic Punjabi militants were targeted. At least three were killed.

The Pakistani Taliban and its ally, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, separately claimed responsibility for Sunday’s attack on Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport, in which at least 35 people were killed, including 10 attackers.

There is widespread opposition among Pakistanis to U.S. drones, and the government officially condemns the strikes as violations of Pakistan’s sovereignty and calls them counterproductive to peace and stabilization efforts. The Pakistani government on Thursday condemned the two North Waziristan drone strikes.

“These strikes are a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. “Additionally, these strikes have a negative impact on the government’s efforts to bring peace and stability in Pakistan and the region.”

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s government began a tentative peace process with the Pakistani Taliban in January, which led to a cease-fire in March. There was little progress, however, and the cease-fire ended in April.

Islamabad hasn’t formally abandoned peace efforts, but talks have hit a deadlock and officials say an operation against militants in North Waziristan is being considered.

Maulana Sami-ul-Haq, a prominent cleric nominated by the Pakistani Taliban to negotiate with the government, told reporters on Thursday that negotiations are the only way to end the conflict with the Taliban. “Drone strikes kill innocent people, and they have started because the negotiations have stopped,” Mr. Haq said.